Saturday, September 11, 2010

Text of email sent to Doug Fine today, and my reflection on "Farewell, My Subaru":

Hey Doug -

I just read Farewell, My Subaru this morning and wanted to thank you for the laugh. It was a great little book. SO much of your experience mirrors mine - even having Kevin Forrest convert your truck, about the same time he did mine, too, in spring 2007.

BUt it made me feel sad, too, in a big way. I, too, came out here from Long Island, 18 years ago Aug 2, and have lived the natural life gardening, raising livestock, bartering, etc. Except I did not have the luxury of living that way by choice - more because being a poor northern New Mexican (I came home when I came here) necessitates scrimping, recycling, and eating out of the garden. I did really well with my little farm and certified organic nursery - I was the largest producer of certified organic culinary and medicinal here in the southwest up until three years ago. See, I've had Lyme Disease since I was about 17 and, being extremely poor and a single mom, never had the benefit of health insurance. So I built the businesses, built my life, bought my farm, and worked my ass off (also was in school getting my undergrad degree) until the Lyme overtook me. It was a great life and I loved it.

Growing up on the rural north fork of LI, I always had gardens. My grandfather was a bayman in the Peconic Bay (and roofer for Levittown) until high property taxes on the Island forced them upstate about 1979. I spent summers and holidays there gardening, collecting medicinal herbs from the woods, extracting honey from the hives, canning, freezing, splitting wood for heat, sampling homemade wine, kneading bread dough, etc. I've known how to raise food and small livestock all my life and loved my little farm here in Taos. We had chickens, guineas, milking does, kids on occasion, horses, dogs, cats, and wildlife like great blue herons (stopping for a rest in the pond on the way to Heron Lake, I suppose), muskrat, leaopard bullfrogs, canadian geese, skunks, porcupines, coyotes, and more. In addition to the 130 varieties of herbs, I had 78 varieties of veggie starts and we did 6 different markets in northern NM every week during the season. I know most of the northern NM farming community personally. What starts I didn't sell, I planted out and we had produce to sell (and freeze) all season. My medicines came from the garden, as well as my food, my relaxation, my satisfaction.

But, as one of the characters in your book observed, you can't really do it alone. Its just not possible to keep up with it all, kep it all running smoothly, especially as my physical health declined. So I closed the nursery in summer 2007 and moved to Albuquerque to be closer to medical care (which I never received - I completed two rounds of alternative therapy tho, and have regained much physical functioning but physical work, especially 18 hrs/day 300 days/year is completely out of the question). I also started a MA in Rhetoric and Writing at UNM and am down to my last 3 credits on that degree. I moved back to Taos last Sept (2009) to sell my farm since I have no way to pay for it as I am unable to do the work that i've been an expert in for 20 years. The farm's about to be foreclosed on, any day now, which is really a shame because I have private springs on the property (3.23 acres) that yield at least 3.18ac/ft of water annually. Private water in NM is like gold - you can water all day, every day and never have to share or account for your use. It made my nursery possible for all those years. Its been great, its a beautiful, lush, organic property, the representation of 20 years of hard labor farming, and its about to be totally lost. So that's a little sad. I hate to not be compensated somehow for 20 years of less than $5/hr hard labor. But, oh well, at least i'm still alive, not in searing pain like I was a few years ago, and my cognitive function is restored as far as its going to be. Life is beautiful and i'm still putting one foot in front of the other. Hallelujah!

But back to what makes me sad - your book reminds me of how idyllic life can be when one has, or comes from, plenty of money to live your dreams. Twelve thousand dollars for solar panels, spent without half a thought?!?! IN addition to a windmill, piping, veg oil converter ... all in a year!?! Wow - must be nice. But its unrealistic. Its sad to me that so many people (like my entire class of 11 mostly city-dwellers in Michelle Kell's "Environmental Rhetoric" this semester) read your book and think its an easy shift, beleive that living naturally is just a year-long transition that any of us can do. Maybe its all jolly good fun when you know you are financed and your future is secure. So many of us farmers in NM struggle to feed our families and the populace - but do so very well - because this is what we know how to do, all we know to do in many cases. Its not a game or an experiment for us, we can't pack up and go back where we came from when we've bored of the novelty. Most of us live simple, natural lives because there is just no money or resources to do otherwise. We raise chickens for eggs and meat because to buy organic from the store is too expensive on foodstamps. We have goats because cheap milk is poisoned with pesticides and hormones and organic is unaffordable. We freeze veggies and can fruits because who can afford $3/lb at the grocery store in winter (and that's the non-organic price!)?

I guess its sad to me that those of us who already know how to do all this, who have been raised knowing how to do it, for whom its second nature, who aren't "rawhides", our intrinsic knowledge is disappearing and there is no replacement. We don't have to read a book or call the rancher up the road to ask how to grow/raise it all, be our own vet, fix the vehicles, read the weather, build the barn, run the plumbing and electrical ourselves. We already know and its body-knowledge. For the life of me, I couldn't describe in words how I know which nutrients are needed in my greenhouse full of 10,000 plants. I just know. I can tell by their smell when my livestock is sick. And on and on. We just know these things. We do all this, we are environmentalists, because this is our life and in our blood. We wouldn't think of putting chickens in a coop that wasn't secure from coyotes because its a guaranteed waste of chickens, a waste of those lives that are an integral part of our own. As you experienced, it takes from you personally when you lose even one chicken. This lifestyle is our foundation, our connection to the earth, our fulfillment. We don't do it because its fashionable, or the latest politcally correct perspective, or because we object to Walmart importing crap from China. Its not for the sake of a book or an article or fodder for anecdotes when we return to our "real" lives elsewhere. I think its sad to me because when its a game it has less import, carries less weight; it has less of the stark, sere beauty of the land around us which literally brands our flesh with its power.

Anyway, those are my reflections on your book, the thoughts and feelings it aroused in me. I hope you keep growing and remain dedicated to NM's beauty and promise.

Best Regards,
Heather Rowley

7 comments:

  1. Hello Heather,

    Thanks for posting this email! I really hope you update us when (if) Doug Fine emails you back. I'm curious to hear what is response would be.

    You write "Its sad to me that so many people (like my entire class of 11 mostly city-dwellers in Michelle Kell's "Environmental Rhetoric" this semester) read your book and think its an easy shift, beleive that living naturally is just a year-long transition that any of us can do." Even as a city-dweller, I've never had the impression "living naturally" was an easy thing to do. I'm sorry if you got that impression. My experience (albeit minimal) on subsistence farms has taught me the exact opposite. I appreciate the level of commitment required- it's a job you can't simply leave when the work day and work week is over.

    I thought this was important to clarify.
    Thanks again for posting,
    Laurel

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, Heather -

    Sounds like you have a lot of valuable experiences to share with Doug and others who've gone the route of providing for themselves whether by choice or necessity.

    I must say though I was a little perplexed by the statement about our class that Laurel quoted in her comment. We haven't discussed the book yet, so I'm not sure what gave you the impression that any of us consider the kind of shift Doug made "easy." I have no problem admitting that my farming and building experience is limited, but I do know enough to realize that moving to an off-the-grid kind of lifestyle would be a monumental challenge.

    I was also a little surprised by the tone of parts of your email. When you say things like “plenty of money” and “Wow – must be nice,” and suggest that Doug’s foray into NM was a “game or experiment,” (all in the third to last paragraph) you seem to be saying that he’s rich and misguided, perhaps pursuing his project for the wrong reasons – am I misreading here? Certainly it’s true that compared to some, Fine has money. But denigrating his project because of advantages secured by his (probable) middle-class background doesn’t seem productive. Does that mean that anyone who isn’t born into a rural life shouldn’t seek to undertake one because it will be artificial (a game or experiment) no matter what? What could he have done differently in your eyes to make his project legitimate, or are only those who are forced to live off the grid legitimate? If you think the latter is true, then I think that misses Fine’s larger point. As a culture we’re living unsustainably. One crucial means to fixing this problem is for those of us who rely too heavily on mass production and fossil fuels and not enough on our own ingenuity to give up some comforts and fend for ourselves.

    I agree that Fine’s experiment isn’t perfect, and I can see how it might even come off as slightly offensive or ridiculous to someone who has lived sustainably because of the natural course of her life, and not because of a “forced” change. Still, though, if more of us did some of the things Fine is doing, don’t you think the world would be a better place?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for your comments and questions Dan and Laurel. I'm sorry, I think I could have been clearer by saying that the book seems to give the impression that it is an easy shift. The book gives the impresson that the transition is fairly easy and its all fun and games, with obstacles to chuckle at later in a simply-penned book for popular consumption. I'm afraid Fine oversimplifies to the point of skewing reality which, to the untrained and inexperienced (in rural/natural/ag lifestyle) I fear can be quite dangerous and is certainly misleading.

    I'm glad my email surprised you in places, Dan. I'm not denigrating his project because of his "advantages" because, to my way of thinking, his bankroll provided him only the opportunity to bypass the very real issues that people face. In other words, his funders did not give him an advantage - they simply calved his expereince from the flanks of real life experience. It seems to me that anyone who was financed to the tune of AT LEAST $60K (for expenses alone, not considering the principle on the property/home) would have to be completely irresponsible to NOT learn something. In other words, considering the advantage he had (some might say a huge head start), it would have been almost impossible to fail. Would you give a student 90 unearned bonus points on an exam and then congratulate him for getting a 95%? THere were no worries, none of the very real and difficult decisions to make such as: if I spend $12K on another solar panel, will I still be able to afford food for my family and livestock this winter? Real life is far more intense than a well-funded romp in the desert.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. response continued ......

    "If more of us did some of the things ..." is pretty vague. Yes, of course we can all do little things to improve sustainibility. But in making that question more specific I read "If more of us had the opportunity to experiment with natural living with a huge bankroll, would it make us more sustainable overall?" The answer to that is NO. Inexperience and bumbling through resources, the lives of your livestock, and many tens of thousands of dollars is NOT sustainable and would have a net detriment to the environment, especially if more folks did it. Most folks are better off making small changes (like recycling, turning off water when you brush teeth, keeping lights out and AC up a few degrees, carpooling) than wasting $100K+ that, if we are looking for max efficiency of use toward sustainability efforts, would be better spent teaching urbanites little ways to make a huge aggregate benefit - like composting and growing whatever they can in pots on their patios. In the hands of real farmers, genuine stewards of the land, $100K will do a lot more aggregate good than in the hands of one man who seems to have wasted a lot due to inexpereince - they can repair a riparian habitiat along a river where their cattle graze, or install a "bloom box" to power their (and their neighbors') ranches, or install drip irrigation on their 600 acres to save tens of thousands of gallons of water annually (so others can use it), or subsidize 10 farmers' efforts to get their produce into the schools so 4000 kids can eat fresh local produce.

    Its all fine and well for an experiment but it MUST be emphasized that Fine's rabbit hole is very, very far from objective, modern reality. And completely unfeasible for just about anyone else to even attempt. A fun read - I love that whoever took him hunting told him ot was a 30.07 rifle. there's no such thing to my knowledge. only a 30.06. little things like that are how locals place a little marker in the consciousness of newbies - when they go around crowing about their new "knowledge" they are easily identifiable to those who really do know. lolol - its a NM inside joke, I guess.

    What could he have done differently? My #1 suggestion would be for him to have learned ahead of time, made a real study through journalistic interviews (his profession and training) and years of hands-on living, how to best use the resources he was fotunate enough to have. He could have lived with, and worked for, real farmers and ranchers to learn how to be a responsible and respectful steward BEFORE he ran roughshod over many of the core principles of sustainable ag.

    I think its lovely that Doug (and now his family) are able to live their dream. Its just important to me that people realize that what he has done really IS a dream, and waaaay outside the realities possible for actual farmers/ranchers and waaaay beyond the reach of basically anyone who does NOT have funders in the wings. Its just not a realistic (or, in many cases, accurate) account of what could - or even should - be done to improve the aggregate sustainability of our culture.
    IMHO

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi, Heather -

    I actually think what you're doing here is important. Since Thoreau's Walden, people have been questioning (and rightfully so) the motives behind what we might call "environmental stunts." In Thoreau's case, one wouldn't guess from his self-righteous tone that he was bringing his laundry home to his mother each night, or squatting on his friend's land, but both are true.

    Just like with Walden, though, I think there's a larger point that's missed if we dwell only on this level of context - the one that points to the many shortcomings of any project like this. Was Thoreau genuine and transparent about his motives and the full context of his situation at Walden Pond? No, he wasn't. Yet the book still did something profound by bringing American letters to a level of consciousness about the environment and man in the balance of nature that no other book accomplished. Now, the fact that Thoreau was somewhat disingenuous is only a very small part of the conversation about Walden, and no one who studies American lit, or the legacy of Thoreau’s writing, would say that these historical facts have done much to reduce his stature or his book’s effects.

    Of course Fine’s book isn’t Walden. But he’s writing in a tradition that’s a little “stunty.” And these books and their authors are big right now. There’s that one guy who calls himself “Zero Impact Man” who tried to make no negative impact on the environment (no trash or direct use of fossil fuels) while he lived in Manhattan. A stunt? Yup. A golden opportunity to write a book and get paid to speak all over the country? That too. But what he and Fine have in common is sharing a larger message that people need to hear. I’m sure all you’re saying is true, but I also think criticism at the level of the immediate context of Fine’s farm and bank account only reveal a small part of the picture drawn by this book and books like it.

    See you tonight in class,

    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow - I posted a lenghty response here on the morning of the 15th. I know it was here - I reread it on the site after it was posted.

    Does anyone know what happened to it? Do blog sites ever automatically delete postings? Should I create all postings in word so I have a back-up copy in case it is somehow erased?

    Dan, does the blog have a history that we can search for it?

    ReplyDelete